旋转的爱

US smears China’s Huangyan Dao nature reserve amid Philippine provocations; Washington’s verbal backing offers no real support, fuels tensions: expert_我的网站

一 |     

    An aerial drone photo taken on May 2, 2026 shows reefs in the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao in the South China Sea. Photo: Xinhua
Amid a new round of Philippine hype over its so-called territorial claims involving China's Huangyan Dao, the US State Department on Saturday, in a statement, smeared China's Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve as "destabilizing" and pledged support for its ally. A Chinese expert said Washington is encouraging Manila to disrupt regional peace while offering little more than hollow verbal assurances, further undermining stability in the South China Sea.
The statement, published on the State Department's official website and attributed to spokesperson Thomas Pigott, claimed that the US "rejects China's ongoing attempts to enforce its destabilizing 'national nature reserve'" at Huangyan Dao.
Pigott also alleged that the reserve would "deny Filipino fishermen access to their traditional fishing ground as reflected in the 2016 Arbitral Award."
It is absurd for the US, a country that is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to pass judgment on the Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve, Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Sunday.
The US has neither jurisdiction in the South China Sea nor the standing to judge regional affairs. Its allegation of the reserve at this time is merely intended to echo the Philippines' latest hype surrounding Huangyan Dao, Yang said.
At a time when the broader China-US relationship is moving toward an easing of tensions, attempts by certain US officials to encourage provocations out of narrow political interests run counter to the overall trend, Yang said.
Pigott further smeared the reserve as "another unilateral attempt by China to use dubious environmental and legal pretexts," which he claimed was intended to advance China's territorial and maritime claims in the South China Sea "at the expense of its neighbors."
"The United States stands with our Ally, the Philippines, in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific," Pigott claimed.
The expert added that the statement also invoked the unlawful and invalid 2016 "South China Sea Arbitral Award" as a pretext, seeking to portray China as a destabilizing force in the region and mislead the international community.
The US statement comes as Manila has sought to advance its claims over Huangyan Dao through various means, including by delimitation of the so-called "baselines of the territorial sea" of the Chinese territory of Huangyan Dao. The Chinese Foreign Ministry on July 31 described the move as "illegal, null and void."
Yang said that amid a broader retrenchment of its global strategy, the US is seeking to encourage countries including Japan and the Philippines to stage regional provocations and disrupt stability. Such tactics include organizing joint military exercises and tolerating provocative actions by Manila in the South China Sea.
However, Washington is no longer capable of offering the Philippines substantive support and can provide little more than rhetorical backing, Yang said. Such statements amount to words on paper and have no practical effect, he added.
China's State Council approved the establishment of the Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve in September 2025. China has since conducted multiple scientific surveys in the area.
On August 1, China issued management measures for the reserve, prohibiting unauthorized fishing and mining, the harvesting or excavation of corals, coral reefs and giant clams, as well as other activities that damage rare marine species or the reserve's natural ecosystems.
China has also discovered a globally rare coral reef growth structure-type marine blue hole at Huangyan Dao. Preliminary geochronological analyses suggest that the blue hole formed at least 3,200 years ago, while surveys have found rich biodiversity in its surrounding waters. The finding is considered further evidence of the effectiveness and necessity of China's ecological protection measures at Huangyan Dao.
。

二 | 据《福克斯新闻》1月11日报道，《北京时间》报道，亚马逊首席执行官贝佐斯周三宣布，他和妻子麦肯齐将结束25年的婚姻，这让很多人对这位世界首富将面临的1370亿美元资产感到疑惑。据最新报道，这对夫妇没有签署婚前协议，使贝索斯的大量资产面临风险。据美国娱乐新闻网站TMZ援引“知情人士”的消息来源，贝佐斯夫妇没有签署婚前协议，因此他们的资产将被分割，但莫莉B.肯尼律师事务所的莫莉肯尼（Molly B.Kenny）表示，财产分割不一定是五分之五。

三 | 根据法律的定义，离婚夫妻的财产分割必须“公平公正”。这不一定是一个半点半的观点，无论是法令还是相关的法律都是一样的，”肯尼说。但是华盛顿特区家庭法组织的律师劳里·罗伯逊指出，法院可能认为贝索斯的婚姻是一场“长期婚姻”，这可能“使双方在财产和未来收入方面处于类似的财务状况。

四 | ”肯尼补充说，由于贝索斯的大部分资产都与亚马逊股票挂钩，这场政变Le有很多方法来分配他们的资产，考虑到这些股份是以贝索斯的名义持有的，投票权不应该成为问题。”这是可以商量的，但这不应该是一个大问题，因为她没有参与公司的运作，”肯尼说。她的兴趣是公司继续发展、成功和盈利。

五 | 他们的利益是一样的，她相信贝索斯经营公司——看看他取得了什么成就。54岁的贝佐斯每年卖出10亿美元，为他的另一家公司BlueOrigin提供资金。在宣布贝索斯离婚后，一些人担心贝索斯继续资助蓝本的能力可能会受到影响，但肯尼说，情况并非如此，因为蓝本是一种“社区资产”。

六 | 我猜他们已经达成或正在达成协议，蓝色的起源不会受到影响。对许多人来说，贝索斯停止融资的后果是非常严重的。

七 | 除了亚马逊的股份，贝索斯还拥有大量的房地产，总面积约40万英亩。

八 | 罗伯逊说，财产分割的第一步是将这些资产归类为社区资产或独立资产，但考虑到这些财产是在结婚期间购买的，它们很可能被归类为社区资产。下一步是雇佣人员评估房产。亚马逊没有立即回复置评请求。周三，贝佐斯在推特上说，他和妻子决定离婚。”我们想让你知道我们的生活，”贝索斯写道。正如我们的家人和朋友所知道的，经过长期的爱情探索和分离，我们决定离婚，并在未来成为朋友。”在声明之后，有报道称贝索斯曾秘密约会劳伦桑切斯，前电视节目主持人，怀疑在婚姻中作弊。

Current article:http://6tmhzao.minpinpengcemiuanjiuxuan.pics/news/20260826_668.html

Published on:10:25:32